<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review : Shure SE210 Earphones &#8211; Analysed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Notice Bored</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gord</title>
		<link>http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/comment-page-1#comment-94871</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/#comment-94871</guid>
		<description>One thing you didn&#039;t mention, which needs to be done for ALL earphones and headphones is, THEY NEED TO BE BREAKEN IN, after 50 hours or more of break-in they will sound their optimal, give it a try, you&#039;ll be pleasantly surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing you didn&#8217;t mention, which needs to be done for ALL earphones and headphones is, THEY NEED TO BE BREAKEN IN, after 50 hours or more of break-in they will sound their optimal, give it a try, you&#8217;ll be pleasantly surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review : Shure SE310 Earphones better than the SE210 ? &#62; Tarkan Akdam&#8217;s BORED</title>
		<link>http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/comment-page-1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Review : Shure SE310 Earphones better than the SE210 ? &#62; Tarkan Akdam&#8217;s BORED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] As this review mainly comprises of comparisons between the two I suggest you refresh your memory with my thoughts on the first one here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As this review mainly comprises of comparisons between the two I suggest you refresh your memory with my thoughts on the first one here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarkan</title>
		<link>http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to taint my forthcoming reviews but the SE530 to me is the pinacle of earphones at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to taint my forthcoming reviews but the SE530 to me is the pinacle of earphones at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarkan.info/20070708/reviews/shure-se210-review/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I have at this point tried the SE210 &amp; SE530&#039;s  I aggree with 
your review of the 210&#039;s.  The 530&#039;s I found to be amazing, they ought to be for the price!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have at this point tried the SE210 &amp; SE530&#8242;s  I aggree with<br />
your review of the 210&#8242;s.  The 530&#8242;s I found to be amazing, they ought to be for the price!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

